USPTO serial 74088369
LIMOUSINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIMOUSINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bromptonville, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | board games | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |