USPTO serial 74088969
PULVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LERNER, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PULVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SF-33960 Pirkkala, FI
SF-33960 Pirkkala, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Driscoll
DAVID M DRISCOLL WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for grinding minerals, foodstuffs, pharmaceuticals, blast furnace slag, fly-ash and paper industry pigments and other materials for further processing | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | machines for classification as to dimension, weight, and quality for grading and treatment of ground materials; the aforesaid materials before and after grinding; industrial monitors and controls for use in supervising grinding, classification, grading and treatment machinery | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |