USPTO serial 74090012
VANTAGE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VANTAGE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul R. Lamoree
PAUL R LAMOREE WATSON, ESS, MARSHALL & ENGGAS1010 GRAND AVEKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2271UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | data processing and consulting services in the field of insurance and finance utilizing computer programs and computers developed by applicant; education services, namely, providing courses of instruction and seminars to computer operators, management personnel and computer systems designers in the use of computers and software for data processing in the insurance field; computer programming services in the fields of insurance and finance, and processing services and third party administration | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1992 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |