Drawing for YARDMASTER

USPTO serial 74090187

YARDMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YARDMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Z. Peter Sawicki

Z PETER SAWICKISTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001fertilizers, soil supplements, soil conditioners, soil mineral supplements, and soil iron supplements for domestic lawn useABANDONEDJul 19, 1991
005insecticides, fungicides, pesticides, herbicides and soil bactericides for domestic lawn useABANDONEDJul 19, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 23, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 2, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 17, 1995ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance