USPTO serial 74090305
STASSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STASSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip G. Hampton
PHILIP G HAMPTON KENYON & KENYON1025 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | tea, cardamon, cloves, pepper, cinnamon, coffee and spices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |