Drawing for ACRYLON

USPTO serial 74090927

ACRYLON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZULIEVE, ANDREW J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACRYLON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirk M. Hudson

KIRK M HUDSON OLIFF & BERRIDGE277 S WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely nail enamels and polishes; nail hardening products; cuticle treatments; nail care treatments, namely conditioning treatments, drying agents in spray form and ridge filler; nail art, namely removable designs for fingernail decoration and temporary paint-on nail decorations; nail enamel removers; lipstick; lip pencil; hand lotions; nail glues; false nails; lip gloss; nail repair kits comprising, bonding glue, emery pads and silk wrapsABANDONED—
008nail implements, namely nail clippers, nail files, nail nippersABANDONED—
021lip brushesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 8, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance