Drawing for RENTAL KING

USPTO serial 74091592

RENTAL KING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHAW, THOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENTAL KING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald L. Otto

DONALD L OTTO RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR1621 EUCLID AVE19TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042rental and rent-to-own services for appliances, electonic consumer equipment and furnitureABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 2, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 16, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance