USPTO serial 74092395
HOMESTYLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARKS, MARTIN H.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMESTYLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marilyn Brogan
MARILYN BROGAN CURTIS, MORRIS & SAFFORD, PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications and printed matter including books relating to home decoration | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |