USPTO serial 74093893
SUPER DEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1936258Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 1995
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPER DEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC T. FINGERHUT
ERIC T FINGERHUT SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail supermarket services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Giant Food Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Giant Food Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Giant Food Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANT BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUPER DEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |