Drawing for SEG

USPTO serial 74095352

SEG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter S. Stevens

WALTER S STEVENS CHURCHILL BOROWESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION1310 BEULAH RDPITTSBURGH, PA 15235

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037waste incineration servicesABANDONED—
039shipping by land, sea, and air of containers containing radioactive substancesABANDONED—
040compaction, decontamination, and vitrification of radioactive substancesABANDONED—
041education services; namely, conducting personnel training classesABANDONED—
042education services, emergency planning and response consulting services, and waste menagement consulting servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1995ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 16, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 21, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 1, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance