Drawing for EARTH CONSCIOUS

USPTO serial 74095440

EARTH CONSCIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITAKER, LAURIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTH CONSCIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles D. McClung

CHARLES D MCCLUNG CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG & STENZEL600 BEN J FRANKLIN PLZONE S W COLUMBIAPORTLAND, OR 97258

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001fertilizer for domestic useABANDONEDNov 19, 1990
005insecticide, herbicide and fungicide for domestic uses; bait for destroying slugs and snailsABANDONEDNov 19, 1990
031lawn and flower seed for domestic usesABANDONEDNov 19, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 1, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 9, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 1992IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1991CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Oct 18, 1991AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 15, 1991IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance