USPTO serial 74095521
HONEY BUNNIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HONEY BUNNIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Varitz
ROBERT D VARITZ KOLISCH, HARTWELL & DICKINSON200 PACIFIC BLDG520 S W YAMHILL STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | fabric for use in the manufacture of clothing; bedding, such as quilts, pillow cases and comforters; fabric novelty items, such as stuffed toys; clothing kits, including pre-cut fabric pieces for assembly into garments, such as women's and children's clothing; namely, pants, shirts, dresses, skirts and jackets; and wall hangings made of textile or fabrics | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 1985 |
| 025 | women's and children's clothing; namely, pants, shirts, dresses, skirts and jackets | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | fabric novelty items; namely, stuffed toys | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |