USPTO serial 74095860
WHERE'S WALDO?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHERE'S WALDO??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Romford, Essex, RM1 3QR, GB
Romford, Essex, RM1 3QR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pasquale A. Razzano
PASQUALE A RAZZANO FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO277 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10172UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | greeting cards, trading cards, notecards, posters, calendars, bookmarks, printed pictures, writing paper, envelopes and bookcovers and stencil playsets, stickers | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | wearing apparel; namely, pajamas, nightshirts, nightgowns, jackets, maternity tops, coats, suspenders, caps, neckties, slippers and shoes | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | toys; namely, stuffed dolls, handheld electronic games, inflatable toys, ride-on toys, board games, kites, decorative wind socks, yo-yos, flying discs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Handford, Martin
- Other trademarks owned by Handford, Martin
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WHERE'S WALDO?
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |