USPTO serial 74095983
QH WHERE QUALITY AND TECHNOLOGY MEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QH WHERE QUALITY AND TECHNOLOGY MEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred S. Lockwood
FRED S LOCKWOOD LOCKWOOD, ALEX, FITZGIBBON & CUMMINGSTHREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZ STE 1515CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | conducting an incentive awards program to recognize meritorious achievement by suppliers of parts and components to applicant | ABANDONED | Aug 28, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1994 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |