USPTO serial 74096281
NSPECTR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 1992
- Examiner
- MANVILLE, ANNA W.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NSPECTR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Knoxville, TN
Other trademarks owned by COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Knoxville, TN
Other trademarks owned by COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Knoxville, TN
Other trademarks owned by COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW S. NEELY
ANDREW S NEELY LUEDEKA, NEELY & GRAHAM, PCP O BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37907-1871UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for diagnosing the condition of plant machinery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 6, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NSPECTR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |