CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EMERSON ELECTRONIC MOTION CONTROLS

USPTO serial 74098248

EMERSON ELECTRONIC MOTION CONTROLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1803639Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 9, 1993
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EMERSON ELECTRONIC MOTION CONTROLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISABETH COAKLEY

LISABETH COAKLEY HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCPO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009programmable servo control units for industrial use, consisting of brushless servo motors, drives, and controllersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 24, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 13, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 18, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 9, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 10, 2003PR89RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9—
Oct 31, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2003PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jun 24, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jun 24, 2003E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2000C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 6, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 9, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 30, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 13, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 16, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 24, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 8, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 25, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 25, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance