USPTO serial 74099368
DRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2344245Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2000
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
TORONTA, ONTARIO M5J 213, CA
LABATT BREWING COMAPNY LIMITED
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTA, ONTARIO M5J 213, CA
TORONTA, ONTARIO M5J 213, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | alcoholic brewery beverages, namely, beer and ale | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by John Labatt Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 3150216 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LABATT BREWING COMAPNY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by 3150216 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 3150216 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |