Drawing for EXPERT MATCH

USPTO serial 74099462

EXPERT MATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1679094Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 1992
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERT MATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. KINGSTON BERLEW

F KINGSTON BERLEW PALMER & DODGEONE BEACON STBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042locating experts in technical and scientific fields for clients seeking expert assistanceSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 1995C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 18, 1994C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 10, 1992R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 16, 1991CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance