USPTO serial 74100607
MUD MIRACLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUD MIRACLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith D. Cohen
JUDITH D COHEN TOWNLEY & UPDIKE405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | nonmedicated hair care products; namely, shampoos | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |