Drawing for CLASSIC GOURMET

USPTO serial 74101422

CLASSIC GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1738524Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 8, 1992
Examiner
KNIGHT, LISA L.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PCSTE 701 E555 THIRTEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030coffee, decaffeinated coffee, lyophilized coffee, coffee blend, coffee substitute and coffee extractsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 1997C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 20, 1997CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 12, 1997CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 1996PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance