USPTO serial 74102180
THE CONNECTICUT BRIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 1992
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE CONNECTICUT BRIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY B. GEIST
BRADLEY B GEIST BAKER & BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | periodically published magazine supplement concerning weddings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2013 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |