USPTO serial 74102226
CONTRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1765601Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 1993
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONTRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DEX, DE
4950 Minden, DE
4950 Minden, DE
4950 Minden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS S. BAKER, JR
THOMAS S BAKER JR1371 W 3RD AVECOLUMBUS, OH 43212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | process controllers; namely, automation systems and controllers for the flow of energy and conrollers for indusrial processes; and components for such controllers; namely, electric and electronic monitors and controllers, and data processors; excluding all of the following; strip-chart recorders, digital volt meters, electronic microscopes, scanning microscopes, microprobes, image analyzers, spectrometers, universal counters, pneumatic weight converters, and automatic weighting scales | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARTMAN & BRAUN GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOPPE & FAESER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOPPE & FAESER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOPPE & FAESER GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CONTRONIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |