USPTO serial 74102603
TAI PAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAI PAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Head
JAMES R HEAD HEAD & JOHNSON228 W 17TH PLTULSA, OK 74119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen vegetable mixtures | ABANDONED | Sep 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |