USPTO serial 74103584
HIGH DEFINITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH DEFINITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEIDI L. SACHS
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE1201 THIRD AVE 40TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical ultrasound diagnostic apparatus for use in ultrasound imaging and the recording, storing, formatting (including simultaneous multiple image displays) and analyzing of ultrasound images and component parts and accessories thereof | ABANDONED | Apr 23, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |