Drawing for FISK

USPTO serial 74103983

FISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1687379Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 12, 1992
Examiner
MANVILLE, ANNA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES R. BRAINARD

CHARLES R BRAINARD KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009processing unit which acts as a companion to a facsimile machine that will transfer and receive data on a floppy disk, hard disk, magnetic tape or optical diskSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 26, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 1993C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 5, 1993C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 12, 1992R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Dec 30, 1991CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance