Drawing for MONOGRAM

USPTO serial 74104297

MONOGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1970231Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 23, 1996
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONOGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul W. Vapnek

PAUL W VAPNEK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREWTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016pencils, colored lead pencils, ink pens, crayons, black board chalk, mechanical pencils, propelling pencils, clutch pencils, fountain pens, ballpoint pens, roller ball pens, felt markers, fiber pens, porous point pens, drawing pens, tubular pens and writing brushes; refill leads for mechanical pencils, propelling pencils and clutch pencils, refills of ballpoint pens and roller ball pens; pen nibs, pen holders, writing ink, drawing inks, Chinese drawing inks, pencil sharpeners, plastic erasers, rubber erasers, ink erasers, chalk erasers, correcting fluids, erasing shields, adhesives for stationery, adhesive tape for stationery, cardboard display boxes for stationery, pastels, artist's charcoals, date stamps, numbering stamps, ink pads, tracing cloths, drawing boards, drawing compasses, ungraduated drawing rulers, protractors, drafting triangles, templates for drawing curves, stencils, and clips for stationerySECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2001C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 23, 2001CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2000CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 2000PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 21, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 6, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 22, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 19, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 25, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 31, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 1993REINREINSTATED—
Sep 2, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance