USPTO serial 74104391
DARE TO DREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DARE TO DREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Sakoi
JEFFREY M SAKOI CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting seminars and classes in the field of self-improvement for young people | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |