Drawing for SPARC COMPLIANT SCD

USPTO serial 74104486

SPARC COMPLIANT SCD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPARC COMPLIANT SCD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark F. Radcliffe

JON MICHAELSON ESQ COUDERT BROTHERS, LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REAL 4TH FLPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting services regarding computer hardware and computer programsABANDONEDJul 31, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1994SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 1994EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 26, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 26, 1994EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 13, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 1993EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 22, 1993EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 1993EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 29, 1992EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 1992EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 28, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance