USPTO serial 74106033
TR TELE FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TR TELE FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Grace
JAMES W GRACE1500 N DALE MABRY HWYP O BOX 31601TAMPA, FL 33631-3601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal pipe and pipe fitting assemblies, namely, rigid ductile iron pipe and rigid ductile iron fittings in an assembly having limited deflection capability for use in water distribution, waste water disposal and fire main systems for commerical, industrial and governmental entity installations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1998 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |