USPTO serial 74106142
"BOAT DRINK"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with "BOAT DRINK"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A ROSENBLOUM
ROBERT A ROSENBLOUM KATZ SMITH & COHEN3423 PIEDMONT RD NE STE 200ATLANTA, GA 30305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic cocktail mixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |