Drawing for HITOP

USPTO serial 74106237

HITOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1708869Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 18, 1992
Examiner
BRANZELLE, JUDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HITOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven L. Oberholtzer

STEVEN L OBERHOLTZER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCEP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042technical analysis in the field of human/machine interactionEXPIREDJun 15, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 17, 1997C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 21, 1997815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 18, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 26, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance