USPTO serial 74107163
DISSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS P. MCNAMARA
THOMAS P MCNAMARA KALISH & WARD4100 BARNETT PLZ101 E KENNEDY BLVD P O BOX 71TAMPA, FL 33601-0071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | machetes, scales, triangles, protractors and leather paper weights, leather machete sheaths, tripods, tribrach adapters (to hold measuring accessories on tripods), prism poles, prism bags, leather sheaths to hold plum bobs, leather radio holsters, stake bags (to hold wooden stakes) | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | prisms, hand levels | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | field books (books for recording field notes by surveyor) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |