USPTO serial 74108398
LUMI-BIOTIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMI-BIOTIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles C. Wong
Charles C. Wong BECKMAN COULTER, INC.250 S. Kraemer Blvd.Brea, CA 92821UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | scientific chemical reagents; namely, dioxetanes for use in detection in molecular biology and life science research | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |