USPTO serial 74109322
SKOAL ACTIVE WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKOAL ACTIVE WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred A. Keire
FRED A KEIRE CURTIS, MORRIS & SAFFORD, PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BABCO ASSOCIATES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BABCO ASSOCIATES, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SKOAL ACTIVE WEAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |