USPTO serial 74109410
SAN DIEGO CONQUISTADORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2010328Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 1996
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAN DIEGO CONQUISTADORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANIL V. GEORGE
ANIL V. GEORGE NBA PROPERTIES, INC.Olympic Tower - 645 Fifth AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shirts, hats and caps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Busch, John A.
- Other trademarks owned by NBA PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Busch, John A.
- Other trademarks owned by Busch, John A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SAN DIEGO CONQUISTADORS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |