USPTO serial 74110272
APROPOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APROPOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GIPPLE & HALE
6667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches, parts therefore, watch straps, watch guards, watch compasses, watch fobs in the nature of decorative or functional ornaments which can be slipped on a watch band, clocks, timers; namely, chronometers and chronographs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |