USPTO serial 74110295
ARGYLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGYLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin LuKacher
CLINTON SQSTE 900ROCHESTER, NY 14604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's clothing, specifically, suits, sports jackets, trousers, shirts, and ties | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |