Drawing for VACUPLEX

USPTO serial 74110855

VACUPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORNELIUS, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VACUPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PC555 THIRTEENTH ST N WSTE 701 EWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010plastic laboratory disposables, namely an evacuated plastic tube used solely for collecting blood from a patientABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 1995ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jun 1, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 9, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 22, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 25, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 1991LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Mar 25, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 21, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance