USPTO serial 74111898
NADA NUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1760705Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 1993
- Examiner
- HENDERSON, KEITH L.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NADA NUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc., The
Chestnut Hill, MA
Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc., The
Chestnut Hill, MA
Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc., The
Chestnut Hill, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | wearing apparel; namely, pants, sold through applicant's stores | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NADA NUFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1995 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |