USPTO serial 74112818
P.P.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P.P.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PEDIGREE PERFECTION ENTERPRISES INC.
Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by PEDIGREE PERFECTION ENTERPRISES INC.
PEDIGREE PERFECTION ENTERPRISES INC.
Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by PEDIGREE PERFECTION ENTERPRISES INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy Machaalany
Roy Machaalany Flansberry Menard and Associates208-4275 Innes Rd.Ottawa, Ontario, K1C1T1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | neckchains, bracelets, I.D. tags, pendants, and leashes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 11, 1993 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |