USPTO serial 74112849
AMERICAN MUSCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1693779Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 1992
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN MUSCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph M. Kuo
Joseph M. Kuo SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP161 North Clark Street, Suite 4200Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toy model vehicles | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ertl Company, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Ertl Company, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by RACING CHAMPIONS ERTL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named AMERICAN MUSCLE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 8, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 8, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 1998 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 12, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |