USPTO serial 74112852
AZONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AZONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
Chatsworth, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad Jefferson Landon
BRAD JEFFERSON LANDON DOUGHERTY & LANDON APC29975 TECHNOLOGY DR STE 101MURRIETA, CA 92563UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motorcycle helmets, sunglasses, motorcycle goggles | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | traveling bags | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | sports apparel for men, women and children comprising of T-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, jackets, pants, shorts, belts, shoes, boots, gloves, hats, sweatsuits, swimsuits, wetsuits, wetsuit gloves, wetsuit shoes, soxs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jim O'Neal
- Other trademarks owned by Jim O'Neal
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AZONIC
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |