USPTO serial 74113242
SPACE SAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPACE SAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Previto
JOSEPH H PREVITO STOLL, MISKIN, PREVITO & HOFFMAN350 FIFTH AVE STE 6110NEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | geared air actuator to control the operation of valves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |