USPTO serial 74113883
FLEXILINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 1994
- Examiner
- MANVILLE, ANNA W.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLEXILINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
Tucson, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
Tucson, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
Tucson, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
RALEIGH, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY BETH SHAW
MARY BETH SHAW KLETT LIEBER ROONEY & SCHORLING40TH FL ONE OXFORD CTRPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-6498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software to enable the synchronization of data between processors, and user manuals sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MISYS HOSPITAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FLEXILINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2005 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |