USPTO serial 74114039
VAGUE PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VAGUE PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin Komen
EDWIN KOMEN CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S ESTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded motion pictures and videotapes featuring live action and animation | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | books featuring artwork | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services; namely, development, production and distribution of live action and animated theatrical motion pictures and television programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tim Burton, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tim Burton, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VAGUE PRODUCTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |