Drawing for MEDIABASE

USPTO serial 74114094

MEDIABASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIABASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fernanda M. Fiordalisi

FERNANDA M FIORDALISI BUCKNAM AND ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use by advertisers and advertising agents and others and providing information regarding the cost and availability of advertising in publications, television and radioABANDONED—
035consultancy services to business and to advertisers; computerized information storage and retrievalABANDONED—
042on-line database services in the field of advertising rate and availability information for advertisers, advertising agents and others; information services in the field of advertising rates and availability for use by advertisers, advertising agents and others; computer software design services and related consultation services; computer programming services; leasing and rental of computer hardware and software; leasing access time to a computer database in the field of advertising rates and availability for use by advertisers, advertising agents and othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance