USPTO serial 74115511
CONTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CORPORACION MERCANTIL VENEZOLANA, S. A.
Valencia, Estado Carabobo, VE
Other trademarks owned by CORPORACION MERCANTIL VENEZOLANA, S. A.
CORPORACION MERCANTIL VENEZOLANA, S. A.
Valencia, Estado Carabobo, VE
Other trademarks owned by CORPORACION MERCANTIL VENEZOLANA, S. A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. McGlew
JOHN J MCGLEW SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric juice squeezers for kitchens, restaurants, bakeries, and butcher shops; electric fruit and vegetable peelers for kitchens, restaurants, bakeries and butcher shops | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 5, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |