USPTO serial 74115614
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William James Kopacz
WILLIAM JAMES KOPACZ COBRIN, FEINGERTZ & GITTES366 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective crash helmets and closing apparatus for crash helmets | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |