USPTO serial 74115652
ALTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor L. Moskowitz
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET AL400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry, ornamental pins, hat ornaments of precious metal, shoe ornaments of precious metal, watches, watch glasses, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | bags; namely, carry-on bags, clutch bags, gym bags, beach bags, book bags, pouches, purses, handbags, trunks for travelling, travelling bags and umbrellas | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | blouses, suits, jackets, evening dresses and robes, sweaters, sweat shirts, T-shirts, underwear, mufflers, scarves, neckties, caps and hats, stockings and socks, coats, jumpers, blousons, pants, trousers, swim trunks, pajamas, nightgowns, skirts, swimsuits, jerseys, pullovers, cardigans, vests, boleros, one piece dresses, boots, shoes and slippers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AOYAMA SHOHIN KENKYUSHO CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by AOYAMA SHOHIN KENKYUSHO CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ALTRO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |