USPTO serial 74116272
THUNDERON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THUNDERON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NIHON SANMO SENSHOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto-Shi, Kyoto-Fu, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIHON SANMO SENSHOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
NIHON SANMO SENSHOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Fushimi-Ku, Kyoto-Shi, Kyoto-Fu, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIHON SANMO SENSHOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A. DE MEYERE
PATRICIA A DE MEYERE SHEA & GOULD1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1193UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine parts; namely, brushes to remove static electricity in manufacturing lines in factories, in office machines and other electrical apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIHON SANMO SENSHOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by NIHON SANMO SENSHOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named THUNDERON
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |